A place supporting a dialogue among Traditional Cosmopolitan Freemasonry in North America, the Anglo-American tradition of Freemasonry and wider civil society.
Of Revolutions & Reforms
by Wor. Frederick L. Milliken
I have been thinking about the subject we have
been discussing here, and that is how best to be effective in
bringing about new life, new growth, new vitality to our Lodges and
most of all reforms and a new course for our Grand Lodges. How can
we as individuals best influence the course that our Lodges and
Grand Lodges pursue?
The remedy has been proposed that we need to work harder, get
involved, run for a Grand Lodge office, rise to some prominence and
power and then work to change the system from within. If you are not
in the system you can't change it and if you don't work hard to
change it you shouldn't complain or expect it to change "no work, no
effort no gain".
I would like to amplify what has been said to more fully explain why
I think this won't work. Let's explore some finer points and expand
on the concepts and see if there are other ramifications and
possibilities. First of all for most men Masonry is a pleasurable
part time past time, a hobby or interest but not a full time
occupation. Nor can most men make it a full time concern. They may
work long hours at a demanding job; they may have children who need
their time and guidance; their wives may work and therefore they
have to contribute to the management of the household and the care
of their family including things like grocery shopping, cooking some
meals, washing some clothes and driving the kids where they need to
go. They may have responsibilities at their house of worship. They
may have an aging parent who either lives with them and needs
constant care and attention or who lives apart in quarters where
they need to be checked up on constantly.
I say all this because what gets in the way of Masonry is life.
Quite frankly many men may enjoy coming to Lodge and participating
in some of the activities and rituals of the Lodge, but that does
not mean they have the time or inclination to spend enormous amounts
of time and effort to reform a system that has lost its way and
needs a complete overhaul.
I can remember when I first entered Masonry they told me it was only
going to be one night a week. Then I joined an Appendant Body and
that added another night, then I became an officer and that added
another night, then I became a Warden and then a Master and it
became almost every night. That 'just one night a week' became a lot
more than that. But what are you asking of a man who just wants to
enjoy his Masonry? Are you expecting him to devote 20-40 hours per
week for the Craft? Lets be realistic here, let's be practical.
If I were to start worshiping at a new church and its management
were to come to me and say we have only one Pastor who is overworked
and we need more people to help with the liturgy and worship
service, and we don't have enough Sunday school teachers and we
could use more, and we don't have anybody to clean the church and no
money to pay anybody to do that job, and our Secretary is quitting
because she says her salary is too low and we sure could use some
help with mowing our lawns and do you cook at all sir? Now I am
going to say, 'Hey wait a minute, I have come to your church to
worship God, not to toil away for hours without compensation.' And
the reply would come back, 'If you can't help the church be a great
church by donating time, treasure and talent, then there just won't
be any church here for you to worship in.'
See where we are here? That's where we are in Masonry right now. We
expect too much from men who have job and family obligations. We ask
for too much for nothing expecting our membership to give and give
and give. And as our numbers dwindle there is a greater burden
placed on those who remain. I have seen too many Masters under too
much stress. And our Grand Lodges still commit us to huge
Institutionalized Charity projects.
Our number one cause of our drop in membership is no longer the
cause of death. We are now losing more Brothers because they are
quitting, packing up and leaving. We now have a retention problem.
And the more burdens we place on those remaining, and the more we
expect from those left to pick up the slack, the more members will
continue to leave. Quite frankly the large bulk of membership does
not want to live Masonry 24/7. And they resent being constantly
asked to devote much time and energy to fund raisers and charitable
programs for the general public when their main reason for joining
was to practice Masonry. So asking men to step up to the plate, run
for Grand Lodge Office, work every night and on weekends for the
Craft is totally unrealistic. And if you stand there and say 'well
if you don't like the way Masonry is being run and you don't like
what you see why don't you get more active and work to change things
is just so much unrealistic, impractical and uncaring hot air. This
way of thinking takes away from the responsibility local Lodge and
Grand Lodge officers now have to the Brethren to run a good ship and
choose the right course. And it will not make Masonry grow because
it will lose more members than it brings in.
Why are we in this fix? What has gotten us into such a tailspin?
What can we do to get out?
When we took in large numbers of members after WWII we took in men
who were not interested in the character building side of
Freemasonry which involved research, study and education 'learning
about the symbolism and ethics of Masonry and the meaning and
applications for every day life. They wanted to continue the
camaraderie they got to experience in fighting a war. Nothing brings
you closer to understanding the concept of brotherhood than your
life being dependent on your buddy, on you unit. So what we got was
good time Charlie social Masonry. Now normally there will be a shift
in emphasis with a leadership change which comes about when the next
generation joins the Craft. But the Vietnam War destroyed all that.
Dropping out and doing what feels good killed the interest of the
next generation in joining Freemasonry. Actually it killed the
interest in joining almost anything. So the same generation, the
same leaders stayed in power twice as long as they normally would.
They worked a double shift.
This had two disastrous effects. First it created a tremendous
double generation gap. You had young men coming into the Craft
looking at a Lodge ruled and governed and populated by men old
enough to be their grandfathers. If you think there is a generation
gap between father and son you ought to see how great it is between
grandfather and grandson. Out of sight. Camaraderie was not the
same. And fifty years of unquestioned power and governing inbred
into the psyche of these WWII Masons that they had the only way of
doing things. Thus 'we always did it this way' became a reality
because it truly was done that way for such an extended period of
time. As previously stated, normally every 25 years there would be a
turnover in leadership with a new generation taking over and
imprinting their generational vision on Masonry. But that did not
happen around 1975 when it should have occurred.
Finally as Masonry bleedingly limped into the 21st century younger
Brothers were forced to take the reins of leadership because most of
the WWII Masons had passed to the Celestial Lodge above. But since
all these new Brothers were trained by the WWII Masons, they too
practiced good time Charlie social Masonry except that by this time
Grand Lodges in a stage of absolute panic had turned Masonry into a
giant Service Club with Institutionalized Charity as the new savior
of Masonry. So what ever Masonic education and study there was now
was totally destroyed with the majority of time, effort and money
going to 'Masonic Awareness' and the marketing of Freemasonry.
Which leads us to point number two. The only grandeur left in
Freemasonry was in political maneuvering. Masonic politics became
the new way to gain preeminence in the Fraternity. No longer were
Masonic men of letters, its writers, researchers and speakers held
in high esteem. For too many years the study and practice of the
mysteries of Freemasonry had been neglected. Now with social Masonry
evolving into Service Club Masonry we were entering our third
generation of Masons who knew very little about the organization to
which they belonged. They didn't study, research, read books, write
or hold any kind of Masonic education programs in their Lodges. Men
now held Grand Lodge office that can't even read Pike or Wilsmhurst
or Pound never mind speak intelligently about any philosophical
underpinnings of the Craft.
So if you didn't have to know anything about Masonry to rise to
preeminence in the Fraternity, how then did you get to be Grand
Master? By all the means used to become President of the United
States. Our Grand Masters became glib, fast talking, charismatic
Masons who ruthlessly wielded the scepter of political power. They
constantly sought to increase the power of Grand Lodge by demanding
of their chartered Lodges that they do this and do that and submit
this report and that report and hold this event and that event.
Today the local Masonic Lodge is scourged of all its individuality
and its ability to be creative on its own. It is in the hip pocket
of the Grand Master and the oligarchy that rules from on high. This
centralization of power closely mirrors the increase in power of
Washington in our civil government.
It cannot be overemphasized that this means that we are now in a
system where it's not what you know but who you know. And the rise
to Masonic power is gained by the means our civil politicians use
building personal relationships, networking and trading favors and
other means which can be more devious but will not be listed. It
then becomes a process whereby what is good for Freemasonry and what
would truly bring it into the 21st century vibrant and growing means
nothing to those in the Grand Lodge system. THEY CARE NOTHING ABOUT
PROGRAMS THAT FURTHER THE CRAFT. They, like every other politician
in life, care about getting, maintaining and wielding power. To
accomplish these ends it matters not where you stand but how others
feel about things and what kind of coalition can be put together and
how a commitment to any issue will affect your standing in the
ability to step up onto the next rung of the ladder.
Faced with these realities you can, outside the inner circle, but
within the system work very hard to reform Freemasonry and return it
to its former grandeur but all that work will yield little result
when most of those in the system with power to implement are only
concerned in putting a feather in their own cap. In other words you
are beating your head against the wall. And when you do all this
work and spend all the time necessary and end up with nothing,
believe me what ensues is utter frustration and chances are you
become another retention statistic because you have left. So this is
why I say extending the effort is fruitless.
So nothing can be done? No I am not saying that. What I am saying is
that if you desire to make change you need to channel your efforts
in another manner. The only thing that power respects is other
power. And the only thing that politicians fear is losing power and
being booted out of office. You don't make the change you seek by
convincing other members in the system the righteousness of your
argument. They don't care how right you are. You don't spend all
your tine and effort into implementing a certain agenda because that
is butting your head against the wall. You don't get anywhere by
being a good little boy, kissing ass, keeping your mouth shut and
trying to climb the ladder without upsetting the applecart. You
don't make change by working inside a system where you have to toe
the line and work hard to further programs that are the exact
opposite of what you want to do, - in order to get ahead. You can't
further the programs of a Grand Lodge which you know are destroying
Freemasonry in order to stay in the system and eventually get enough
power to change it. By the time you get the power, you have worked
so hard to destroy it, that you have actually destroyed it. You
can't work against what you believe in to get ahead. If the present
system is corrupt and you are absolutely convinced that the
direction it is going in is self-defeating then helping those in
power to do more of the same is stupid.
In order to change things you are going to have to play hardball,
because once again the only thing those who worship power alone
respect is the power of others and what they could or might do to
them. Now you may stay in the system but that does not mean you are
going to work to further it. And that does not mean you are going to
enter the corporate Masonic ladder. What you are going to do at
every opportunity you get is to point out the folly of the present
course of action. You are not going to enter into personal attacks
but rather intellectual debates challenging the power structure to
change course. If you are a writer you will write articles
explaining how destructive present policies are and what would work
much better. If you are a speaker you will do the same. If your
Grand Lodge runs opinion forums you will show up and ask the tough
questions that need to be asked. You will write letters and E-Mails
explaining your reforms to any and all. You might form a group of
like-minded reform Brothers and meet on a regular basis 'a reform
club. You will probably launch a Masonic website and from that form
a power base where you constantly point out the destructive path
Grand Lodge is on. Yes you are going to be in their face and they
are not going to like it. But if you stick to ideas and not
personalities you are still on the high road. But you can't change
them you can only defeat them.
Will this course of action jeopardize your membership? Could be.
Depends on what you would rather do, remain on a sinking ship or
stay afloat in a lifeboat. If you are the only one doing this then
obviously you are in some trouble. But what if 300 Brothers all felt
the same way and were all participating with you and were doing some
of the same things? Power respects power. Power does not respect
ideas. Ideas cannot defeat power only ideas with power behind them.
My path personally led me to leave mainstream Masonry and join
Prince Hall. I won't go into the reasons why I made that decision
nor recommend it to others. Some have said that now that I am on the
outside looking in I can no longer influence change. Poppycock! I
didn't leave Freemasonry. I'm still in the legitimate, non
clandestine practice of Masonry. I can speak at other Lodges, I can
write articles, I can blog and in every way still call attention to
failed practices. As time goes by I will be able to visit the
Communication of any mainstream Lodge and in casual conversation
whether over coffee or a pint I can have my say and influence the
thinking of others who in turn will carry the torch of reform into
their Grand Sessions. Who knows what the future holds in store for
the intermingling of Prince Hall & mainstream Masonry. That future
might mean the allowance of dual membership.
And finally what is the way out of this Masonic political power
trip? How do we get politics out of Masonry and get leaders who are
concerned with the quality of the Craft not their own well being?
The reason we got into this mess in the first place is that we
stopped researching, studying and teaching the mysteries of
Freemasonry and venerating our writers, researchers and speakers. If
we return now to correcting that and making the philosophy of
Freemasonry and the practice of its virtues the focal point of our
existence then it will become what you know not who you know which
is important. Our Lodges and Grand Lodges will no longer be
populated by a bunch of know nothing Masons. The way that politics
gains a stranglehold of Freemasonry is to have no other standard of
preeminence available. Only then does power become the standard.
Also a system that encourages the study of itself and exalts the
education of it members places knowledge on a pedestal not raw
political power without knowledge. So when and if we choose to
replace the system we have now with a one that reveres Masonic
knowledge and that requires its leaders to be well versed in the
meaning of Masonry, the symbolism of Masonry, the virtues of Masonry
and the importance of passing on that knowledge then we no longer
will be riding on the roller coaster ride of political gamesmanship.
Right now we are like a church with a Pastor who has no knowledge of
scripture. Right now we are no more advanced than any other
organization out there. To be the noble, grand organization that
stands heads and tails above any other we have to again learn and
teach that Freemasonry is a philosophy of life, a way of life, and
an answer to what is the meaning of life.
In order to get to that point we need to force the issue. Those in
our Grand Lodges so concerned with numbers and dollars and staying
in power will not change and reform of their own free will and
accord. Helping them and working with them only hastens the
destruction of Freemasonry. They will not step down quietly but will
go kicking and screaming, but go they must.
The only thing left to say is that this doesn't apply to everyone,
but if the shoe fits.
Wor. Frederic L. Milliken
TracingBoard.com will be publishing essays and articles from Freemasons from all of the many and varied traditions around the globe. It is the place where understanding and harmony begins.